This archive provides dated information about previous Pratt Campus Climate Surveys. Each survey year includes the questionnaire or topic framework, administration dates, eligible population, number of participants, participation rate, methodology, reporting thresholds, full results, and related institutional updates when available. Because survey instruments and participation may change, compare years only when the measures are sufficiently consistent.
Pratt administered the 2025 Campus Climate Survey from January 29 through February 19, 2025, for students, faculty, and staff. The former Office of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, in partnership with Human Resources, Institutional Equity & Title IX, OIRA, Academic Affairs, and Student Affairs, sponsored the survey. The survey addressed belonging and campus culture; accessibility, disability, and campus resources; Title IX, nondiscrimination, and harassment; safety and well-being; bias and discrimination; and related community experiences.
The 2023 Campus Climate Survey focused on tracking progress from previous surveys and addressing emerging needs. Results have highlighted significant trends in accessibility, safety, and DEI. These findings have since guided policies and programs, ensuring that Pratt’s community is responsive to the changing needs of all students, faculty, and staff.
The 2023 Campus Climate Survey examined experiences related to institutional climate and followed earlier survey work. The current public page describes themes in accessibility, safety, and diversity, equity, and inclusion.
The Office of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, in collaboration with Institutional Research, Human Resources, and Student Affairs, administered Pratt’s first integrated Campus Climate Survey for all students, faculty, and staff in November 2019.
The 2019 Pratt Campus Climate Survey was completed by 1,452 community members, with a 19.6% overall participation rate. The majority of survey respondents (45%) were full-time undergraduate students, followed by 17% full-time graduate students, 16% full-time staff, 14% part-time faculty, and 4% full-time faculty. The remaining 4% of respondents were continuing education students, part-time students, and temporary and part-time staff. Of the respondents, 86% were affiliated with the Brooklyn campus, 12% with the Manhattan campus, and 2% with the Pfizer Building and other locations.
Survey Highlights:
Accessibility – Respondents largely agree that Pratt is responsive to the needs of community members with disabilities. Most respondents with disabilities indicated that their accessibility needs were met, with adequate accommodations provided. Some respondents expressed interest in learning more about on-campus resources and Pratt’s Accessibility Advisory Committee.
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) – Most respondents agreed they are treated with mutual respect and felt confident that Pratt’s administration and policies support DEI efforts. Many also reported gaining knowledge of DEI topics due to their Pratt experience. However, underrepresented minority (URM) and Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer/Questioning (LGBTQ+) respondents reported less positive experiences in some DEI-related areas.
Belonging and Campus Culture—Many respondents reported feeling a sense of belonging and value on campus, describing the campus culture as welcoming but noting a need for greater inclusivity. URM, LGBTQ+ respondents, and international students expressed slightly less positive satisfaction in this area.
Title IX and Sexual Misconduct—Most respondents expressed satisfaction with Title IX policies and procedures, feeling confident that complaints would be kept confidential and that they would be protected from retaliation during an investigation. LGBTQ+ respondents, however, were less positive on several Title IX-related statements.
Safety – Most respondents reported feeling safe on campus and trusted the Pratt Administration and Campus Safety Officers to actively ensure their safety. LGBTQ+ respondents were less positive regarding campus safety.
Bias, Discrimination, and Harassment – Most respondents believed incidents of harassment and discrimination would be taken seriously and addressed by Pratt’s administration. However, Asian, Black, and international students reported a higher likelihood of experiencing bias or discrimination, and some felt they were denied opportunities based on their identity.
While the overall results of the Campus Climate Survey were positive, certain groups expressed lower satisfaction, including:
Asian community members
Black community members
Community members with disabilities
International students
LGBTQ+ community members
To address these concerns, the DEI Council integrated more focused strategies into the DEI Strategic Plan to better support the specific needs of these communities.
In November 2019, the former Office of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion worked with Institutional Research, Human Resources, and Student Affairs to administer Pratt’s first integrated Campus Climate Survey for students, faculty, and staff.
The public summary reports 1,452 participants and an overall participation rate of 19.6%. Respondents were reported as 45% full-time undergraduate students, 17% full-time graduate students, 16% full-time staff, 14% part-time faculty, 4% full-time faculty, and 4% continuing education students, part-time students, and temporary and part-time staff. Reported location affiliation was 86% Brooklyn, 12% Manhattan, and 2% Pfizer Building and other locations.
Reported themes
Accessibility: many respondents reported that accessibility needs were met; some wanted more information about campus resources and the Accessibility Advisory Committee.
Respect, inclusion, and belonging: many respondents described positive experiences, while those from several historically underrepresented or marginalized groups reported less positive experiences in some areas.
Title IX and sexual misconduct: many respondents reported confidence in policies and procedures; LGBTQ+ respondents reported less-positive views on several items.
Safety: many respondents reported feeling safe; LGBTQ+ respondents reported less-positive views of campus safety.
Bias, discrimination, and harassment: many respondents expected reports to be taken seriously, while Asian, Black, and international students reported a higher incidence of bias or discrimination in the public summary.
The summary identifies Asian and Black community members, community members with disabilities, international students, and LGBTQ+ community members as groups reporting lower satisfaction in some areas.